Watch Live Feed


Forums >> Big Brother Archives >> BB In-Depth


This is a response to: Paul already renommed Cody at the veto meeting, so there was nothing to it. NT
frustratedposter
Joker Eager Beaver
Reged: 07/23/02
Posts: 31739
Loc: dazed and confused (phila, pa)
So the toads were have nots, but there was little "consequence" to the
07/15/17 12:37 PM




Temptation winner (production choice?)

Entire thread (Refresh)
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Has there been any discussion as to the possibility the Frog Punishment might have another consequence?
Majuro
07/09/17 07:01 PM
xx * Seems strange
macysmom
07/12/17 08:07 AM
xx * it doesn't make sense that the other temptations and curse were potential game changers and this curse is wearing a stupid costume
claird *
07/10/17 08:05 AM
xx * I think they were not able to be picked to play in Saturday's veto comp. NT
caressastar
07/10/17 07:53 AM
xx * I'm rather hoping that V-toads get to veto themselves from the block, should they be put on.....
Nusa
07/10/17 02:05 AM
xx * Paul already renommed Cody at the veto meeting, so there was nothing to it. NT
BB_lovin_SP
07/12/17 09:04 AM
xx * So the toads were have nots, but there was little "consequence" to the
frustratedposter
07/15/17 12:37 PM
xx * That would be an advantage, not a curse. NT
bb4peeker
07/11/17 03:45 AM
xx * Oh, I love that idea! NT
frozencactus
07/10/17 05:52 AM
xx * This would be amazing and such poetic justice to counter the first week. First time the consequence actually affects the tempted. Hope it happens! NT
cryingovercovid
07/10/17 05:08 AM
xx * If there was discussion here, I missed it. RHAP discussed it tonight on their show. I agree, the severity does seem very lopsided. NT
AuntieDee *
07/10/17 12:11 AM

Extra information
Thread views: 1956
Thread Tags: None

Contact Us | Donate | Privacy statement | User List | Retired Forums | Acronyms and Board Terms | Report A Violation Home

*
UBB.threads™

Copyright 2023 JokersUpdates.com (v6.2x.Srv1)